{"id":5294,"date":"2023-09-19T09:27:16","date_gmt":"2023-09-19T07:27:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/?p=5294"},"modified":"2023-09-19T09:34:34","modified_gmt":"2023-09-19T07:34:34","slug":"death-pluralism-a-proposal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/2023\/09\/19\/death-pluralism-a-proposal\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00abDeath pluralism: a proposal\u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/quienes-somos-nueva\/investigadores-en-formacion\/gonzalo-diaz-cobacho\/\">Gonzalo D\u00edaz-Cobacho<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/quienes-somos-nueva\/investigadores-asociados\/alberto-molina-perez\/\">Alberto Molina-P\u00e9rez<\/a> y <a href=\"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/quienes-somos-nueva\/investigadores-garantes-91\/david-rodriguez-arias\/\">David Rodr\u00edguez-Arias<\/a>, todos ellos miembros e investigadores de FiloLab y del proyecto <a href=\"https:\/\/www.inedyto.com\/inedyto-ii-final-de-la-vida.html\">INEDyTO II<\/a>, acaban de publicar el art\u00edculo \u00abDeath pluralism: a proposal\u00bb en la revista <a href=\"https:\/\/peh-med.biomedcentral.com\/\"><span class=\"c-journal-title__text \">Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine<\/span><\/a> (BMC\/Springer Nature). En el art\u00edculo abordan el debate respecto a la determinaci\u00f3n de la muerte y las objeciones existentes en torno al criterio de la muerte cerebral, lo que ha impulsado a algunos pa\u00edses a adaptar el criterio de la muerte a las creencias y preferencias de las personas. En el art\u00edculo se analizan algunos de los principales enfoques y propuestas te\u00f3ricas y pr\u00e1cticas en la determinaci\u00f3n de la muerte, proponi\u00e9ndose un horizonte te\u00f3rico alternativo en la determinaci\u00f3n de la muerte que podr\u00eda caracterizarse como un \u00abpluralismo d\u00e9bil\u00bb. A continuaci\u00f3n compartimos el abstract y el art\u00edculo en Open Access.<\/p>\n<p>Abstract<\/p>\n<p>The debate over the determination of death has been raging for more than fifty years. Since then, objections against the diagnosis of brain death from family members of those diagnosed as dead-have been increasing and are causing some countries to take novel steps to accommodate people\u2019s beliefs and preferences in the determination of death. This, coupled with criticism by some academics of the brain death criterion, raises some questions about the issues surrounding the determination of death. In this paper, we discuss some of the main approaches to death determination that have been theoretically proposed or currently put into practice and propose a new approach to death determination called \u00abweak pluralism\u00bb as a reasonable ethical and political alternative to respect diversity in death determination.<\/p>\n<p>C\u00f3mo citar:<\/p>\n<p>D\u00edaz-Cobacho, G., Molina-P\u00e9rez, A. &amp; Rodr\u00edguez-Arias, D. Death pluralism: a proposal.\u00a0<i>Philos Ethics Humanit Med<\/i>\u00a0<b>18<\/b>, 10 (2023). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13010-023-00139-3<\/p>\n<p>Puede accederse al art\u00edculo <a href=\"https:\/\/peh-med.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13010-023-00139-3#citeas\">aqu\u00ed<\/a><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-5295\" src=\"http:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/Gonzalo-Diaz-Death-Pluralism-300x159.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"541\" height=\"337\" \/><\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gonzalo D\u00edaz-Cobacho, Alberto Molina-P\u00e9rez y David Rodr\u00edguez-Arias, todos ellos miembros e investigadores de FiloLab y del proyecto INEDyTO II, acaban de publicar el art\u00edculo \u00abDeath pluralism: a proposal\u00bb en la revista Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine (BMC\/Springer Nature). En el art\u00edculo abordan el debate respecto a la determinaci\u00f3n de la muerte y las objeciones [&hellip;]<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5295,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2218,21],"tags":[2004,925,408,3174,2276,3176],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5294"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5294"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5294\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5301,"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5294\/revisions\/5301"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5295"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wpd.ugr.es\/~filolab\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}