On this page, we will include a list of updated bibliographic references related to the topic of our project.

• Almagro, M., Hannikainen, I. R. & Villanueva, N. (In press). Who has a free speech problem? Motivated censorship across the ideological divide. (Ed.). Experimental Philosophy of Language. Springer.
• Almagro, M. (2023). Political polarization: Radicalism and immune beliefs. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 49(3), 309–331. DOI: 10.1177/01914537211066859.
• Almagro, M. & Villanueva, N. (2022). Ideología, polarización afectiva y análisis del discurso. Bajo palabra, revista de filosofía, 31, 174-203.
• Almagro, M.l & Villanueva, N. (2022). Desacuerdos cuidados. SCIO, Revista de Filosofía, 22, 67-97..
• Bordonaba, D. & Villanueva, N. (2022). “Retractación y contextualismo: nuevas condiciones de adecuación”. En D. Pérez Chico (ed.), Contextualismo semántico, Zaragoza: Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
• Bordonaba, D., Fernández, V. & Torices, J. R. (2022), The Political Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Reflections on Social Injustice and Oppression. De Gruyter.
• Cassam, Q. (2022). Extremism. A Philosophical Analysis . Routledge.
• Almagro, M. & Villanueva, N. (2021a). Polarización y tecnologías de la información: radicales vs. extremistas. Dilemata, Revista Internacional de Éticas Aplicadas, 34, 51-69.
• Almagro, M. & Villanueva, N. (2021b). Exactly, what do you mean? Daimon, Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 84.
• Almagro, M., Hannikainen, I. R. & Villanueva, N. (2021). Whose words hurt? Contextual determinants of offensive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/01461672211026128
• Almagro, M., Osorio, J., & Villanueva, N. (2021). Weaponized Testimonial Injustice. Las Torres de Lucca, 10 (19): 29-42.
• Bosco, A. & Verney, S. (2021). Polarisation in Southern Europe: Elites, Party Conflicts and Negative Partisanship. South European Society and Politics, 25:3-4, 257-284, DOI: 10.1080/13608746.2020.1971444
• Broncano-Berrocal, F. & Carter, J. A. (2021). The Philosophy of Group Polarization: Epistemology, Metaphysics, Psychology. Routledge.
• Cepollaro, B., Soria, A. & Stojanovic, I. (2021), “The semantics and pragmatics of value judgments”, in P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Edenberg, E. & Hannon, M. (2021). Political Epistemology. Oxford University 
• Ganapini, M. B. (2021). The signaling function of sharing fake stories. Mind & Language. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12373
• Hannon, M. (2021). Disagreement or Badmouthing? The Role of Expressive Discourse in Politics. In E. Edenberg & M. Hannon (Eds), Political Epistemology. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192893338.003.0017
• Hannon, M. & de Ridder, J. (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. Routledge.
• Talisse, R. (2021). Sustaining Democracy. What We Owe to the Other Side. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Tanesini, A. Lynch, M. (2021), Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism: Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge.
• Williams, D. (2021). Signalling, commitment, and strategic absurdities. Mind & Language. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12392
• Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., and Shapiro, J. M. 2020. Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization. Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Finkel, E. J., C. A. Bail, M. Cikara, P. H. Ditto, S. Iyengar, S. Klar, L. Mason, M. C, McGrath, B. Nyhan, D. G. Rand, L. J. Skitka, J. A. Tucker, J. J. Van Bavel, C. S. Wang & J. N. Druckman (2020). Political sectarianism in America. Science, 370 (6516), pp. 533-536.
• Funkhouser, E. (2020). A tribal mind: Beliefs that signal group identity or commitment. Mind & Language. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12326
• Gidron, N., Adams, J., and Horne, W. (2020). American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Pinedo, M. (2020). Ecological psychology and enactivism: A normative way out from ontological dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–10.
• Carothers, T. & O’Donohue, A. (2019). Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization. Brookings Institution Press.
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034.
• Gibson, J. L., Epstein, L., & Magarian, G. P. (2019). Taming uncivil discourse. Political Psychology, 41, 383–401. https:// doi.org/10.1111/pops.12626
• Lynch, M. P. (2019). Know-it-all society: Truth and arrogance in political culture. Liveright Publishing.
• McCarty, N. (2019). Polarization: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
• McCoy, J. & Somer, M. (2019). Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: Comparative evidence and possible remedies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 234–271.
• Osorio, J. & Villanueva, N. (2019). Expressivism and crossed disagreements. In M. J. Frápolli (Ed.), Expressivisms, Knowledge and Truth. Royal Institute of Philosophy.
• Talisse, R. (2019). Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in Its Place. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Viciana, H., Hannikainen, I. & Gaitán, A. (2019). The dual nature of partisan prejudice: Morality and identity in a multiparty system. Plos One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219509
• Bordonaba, D. & Villanueva, N. (2018). Affective polarization as impervious reasoning. In Philosophical Perspectives. The 13th conference of the Italian Society for Analytic Philosophy: Italian Society for Analytic Philosophy.
• Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Broadway Books.
• Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
• Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Harvard University Press.
• Wojcieszak, M., & Garrett, R. K. (2018). Social Identity, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization: How Priming National Identity Shapes Attitudes Toward Immigrants Via News Selection. Human Communication Research 44 (3): 247-273.
• Bramson, A., Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Berger, W. J., Sack, G., Fisher, S., Flocken, C., & Holman, B. (2017). Understanding polarization: meanings, measures, and model evaluation. Philosophy of science, 84(1), 115–159.
• Fiorina, M. P. (2017). Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate. Hoover Press.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Napier, J. L. & Luguri, J. B. (2016). From silos to synergies: The effects of construal level on political polarization. In P. Valdesolo & J. Graham (Eds.), Social Psychology of Political Polarization. Routledge.
• Hetherington, M. J. & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won’t work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. University of Chicago Press.
• Iyengar, S. & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707.
• Mason, L. (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145.
• Charlow, N. (2014), “The problem with the Frege-Geach problem”, Philosophical Studies, 167(3), 635–665.
• Mason, L. (2013). The rise of uncivil agreement: Issue versus behavioral  polarization in the American electorate. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 140–159.
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.
• Riordan, B., Bruni, S., Schurr, N., Freeman, J. & Ganberg, G. (2011). Inferring user intent with Bayesian inverse planning: Making sense of multi-UAS mission management. 20th Behavior Representation in Modeling & Simulation (BRIMS) Conference 2011 Sundance, Utah.
• Schwitzgebel, E. (2011). Knowing your own beliefs. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 35, 41–62.
• Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353–380.
• Baker, C., Saxe, R. & Tenenbaum, J. (2009). Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition, 113, 329–349.
• Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575
• Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353–380.