Society for the advancement of judgment
and decision-making studies
Sociedad para el estudio de los juicios y las decisiones
Society for the advancement of judgment
and decision-making studies
Sociedad para el estudio de los juicios y las decisiones
The founding members are scientists from the fields of psychology, economics, neuroscience, and sport sciences, with strong formal or informal linkages to Spanish research institutions, and are committed to the development of Judgment and Decision-making studies in Spain.
Our aims are to create a new platform on which sharing our common interest on this rapidly growing and evolving field, to promote the tutoring of young researchers, to make interdisciplinary collaborations possible, to elaborate joint research projects, and to attract resources and international contacts.
In the last decades, the study of human judgment and decision-making has been proven productive in a variety of fields, as apparently distant as economics, clinical and social psychology, health sciences, ergonomics, sport sciences and politics.
Descriptive approaches have unveiled striking regularities in the way humans make judgments and decisions, and have provided effective ways to improve them in real environments. Normative approaches, on the other hand, have helped scientists and policy makers to draw the boundaries of human grounded rationality, and to develop decision protocols that can substitute or constrain human operators.
The success of judgment and decision-making as a field is based on some definitional features: interdisciplinarity, methodological and descriptive systematicity, continuous transference from the laboratory to daily-life contexts, distrust in over- and micro-theorization, and, over all, a good deal of critical sense. A taste for looking behind the obvious is certainly not uncommon among those who consider themselves judgment and decision scientists.
Currently, in Spain, a number of internationally oriented research teams are contributing to the growing corpus of evidence in this field. Unfortunately, communication among these groups is still scarce, and no regular meetings exist in which authors from different traditions have the chance to learn from each other. Our aim is to close that gap.
REGISTRATION
If you want to join the SEJyD, please click below to apply.
"Is project-based learning effective among kindergarten and elementary students? A systematic review." Extremely i… t.co/ihRICL50NP
La @SEPEX13 lanza una encuesta para recabar la opinión de la comunidad científica acerca de los criterios de contra… t.co/c3s4bo4hEP
"Cognitive abilities and risk-taking: Errors, not preferences", by L. Amador, @BehSnaps, @Tere_Garcia_M,… t.co/PTaJh104Dg
New cool #SEJyDpapers out! "Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review", b… t.co/cbgIOzNF5D
@A_M_Espin @alberto_ugr If you have any new JDM/BE-related materials you want us to disseminate, just let us know.
"Economics students: self-selected in preferences and indoctrinated in beliefs", new #preprint by @A_M_Espin, M. Co… t.co/rRT42yK9EX
"The tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality", by Manuela Moreno, @FBpsy, &… t.co/opXeI6Yw4M
Great talk by @VerdejoGAntonio on the neurocognitive underpinnings of addictive processes. #SEJyDspotlight t.co/pCsIlGYt6j
If you do research on Judgment and Decision-Making and you want us to disseminate your work, just let us know! #SEJyDpapers #SEJyDspotlight
New #SEJyDpapers "Are methamphetamine users compulsive? Faulty reinforcement learning, not inflexibility, underli… t.co/wRybHoV8Pm