Society for the advancement of judgment
and decision-making studies
Sociedad para el estudio de los juicios y las decisiones
Society for the advancement of judgment
and decision-making studies
Sociedad para el estudio de los juicios y las decisiones
The founding members are scientists from the fields of psychology, economics, neuroscience, and sport sciences, with strong formal or informal linkages to Spanish research institutions, and are committed to the development of Judgment and Decision-making studies in Spain.
Our aims are to create a new platform on which sharing our common interest on this rapidly growing and evolving field, to promote the tutoring of young researchers, to make interdisciplinary collaborations possible, to elaborate joint research projects, and to attract resources and international contacts.
In the last decades, the study of human judgment and decision-making has been proven productive in a variety of fields, as apparently distant as economics, clinical and social psychology, health sciences, ergonomics, sport sciences and politics.
Descriptive approaches have unveiled striking regularities in the way humans make judgments and decisions, and have provided effective ways to improve them in real environments. Normative approaches, on the other hand, have helped scientists and policy makers to draw the boundaries of human grounded rationality, and to develop decision protocols that can substitute or constrain human operators.
The success of judgment and decision-making as a field is based on some definitional features: interdisciplinarity, methodological and descriptive systematicity, continuous transference from the laboratory to daily-life contexts, distrust in over- and micro-theorization, and, over all, a good deal of critical sense. A taste for looking behind the obvious is certainly not uncommon among those who consider themselves judgment and decision scientists.
Currently, in Spain, a number of internationally oriented research teams are contributing to the growing corpus of evidence in this field. Unfortunately, communication among these groups is still scarce, and no regular meetings exist in which authors from different traditions have the chance to learn from each other. Our aim is to close that gap.
REGISTRATION
If you want to join the SEJyD, please click below to apply.
Submission call open for the special issue "Social and Environmental Behavior and Game Theory", edited by our memb… t.co/JwYCw8FQeb
"Preference for curvilinear contour in interior architectural spaces: Evidence from experts and nonexperts", co-au… t.co/sP1qarAZZr
Uno de nuestros socios, @GuidoBCor, solicita vuestra colaboración en este estudio: t.co/OpU5U8Qn0w
More on the 2nd lang. effect: "Foreign language context shapes decision-making, but the scope of its effects might… t.co/Uy4UKk9n7w
Deliberative reasoning is not affected by language (1st vs 2nd).#SEJyDspotlight t.co/4c8djkA6cg
Video game loot boxes are linked to problem gambling: Results of a large-scale survey. #SEJyDspotlight t.co/sOYYqbKd9c
Behavioral science works: A list of the most effective public policy and practice nudges of 2018 #SEJyDspotlight t.co/0fTBS9ajc6
D. Kahneman: "Maximizing happiness doesn’t seem to be what people want to do. They want to maximize their satisfact… t.co/iem1aeaFF4
The growing phenomenon of bookmakers and online gambling in Spain. #SEJyDspotlight t.co/s4asUcCG00
SEJyD members' new paper, in Accident Analysis & Prevention, with @JuanF_Navas @cmartinperez @DafinaPetrova… t.co/CeuL9Nfr0n